The people who agree with this opinion insist there are following advantages. Firstly, we can communicate each other more easily. The problem which misunderstand would be reduced. For example, when a foreigner wants to express his or her thought, there would be no need to interpret it and just say it. Also, we don't need to spend any time to learn other language relatively. Before the reduction of languages, people should have studied various languages. Instead of learning new languages we could study other parts.
However, nevertheless there are these conveniences,I disagree with this insistance. It is because ethnic identity is exposed by their own language. Think our own language would disappear. After then, the citizens would be confused and end up getting rid of their own ethnics by subconsciousness. Besides, language consists of their own culture and history. In some cases, the minority suffer from being combined to other language of the country of majority. The ritual of their own identity would disappear by the time.
For the reasons mentioned above, I totally disagree with the opinion because we have to keep our own ethnics, moreover conserve our history and culture.
In recent times, some languages are disappearing. As far as these are dying out, there is an opinion that this doesn't matter because it will be more convenient if there are only a few languages in the world. But, I'm against to this view.
The people who agree with this opinion insist there are following advantages. Firstly, we can communicate each other more easily. The problem which misunderstand would be reduced. For example, when a foreigner wants to express his or her thought, there would be no need to interpret it and just say it. Also, we don't need to spend any time to learn other language relatively. Before the reduction of languages, people should have studied various languages. Instead of learning new languages we could study other parts.
However, nevertheless there are these conveniences,I disagree with this insistance. It is because ethnic identity is exposed by their own language. Think our own language would disappear. After then, the citizens would be confused and end up getting rid of their own ethnics by subconsciousness. Besides, language consists of their own culture and history. In some cases, the minority suffer from being combined to other language of the country of majority. The ritual of their own identity would disappear by the time.
For the reasons mentioned above, I totally disagree with the opinion because we have to keep our own ethnics, moreover conserve our history and culture.
CORRECTIONS:
In recent times, some languages are disappearing. As far as these are dying out, there is an opinion that this doesn't matter at all, because it will be more convenient if there are only a few languages in the world. But, I'm against to this view.
The people who agreed with this opinion insist there are following advantages. Firstly, we can communicate to each other more easily. The problem with lacked of communicatio would be reduced. For example, when a foreigner wants to express his or her thoughts, there would be no need to interpret it and just say it. Also, we don't need to spend any time to learn other languages relatively. Before the reduction of languages, people should have studied various languages. Instead of learning new languages we could study other parts.
However, there are conveniences, I disagree with this insistance. It is because ethnic identity is exposed by their own language. Think our own language would disappear. After then, the citizens would be confused and end up getting rid of their own ethnics by subconsciousness. Besides, language consists of their own culture and history. In some cases, the minority suffer from being combined to other language of the country because of majority. The ritual of their own identity would disappear by the time being.
For the reasons mentioned above, I totally disagree with the opinion because we have to keep our own ethnics, moreover conserve our history and culture.
