People who believe that the government should play for the money to support old people have valid reasons for saying so.
First, It will be possible for them to make their communities to communicate each other if the government spends the cost and recommends the opportunity to make a conversation among them.
Second, the supporters of this argue that It's one of the government's duties to support the old. because they think that the government isn't non-profit organization compared to the corporations.
on the other hand, there are those who think that the family with the old has to pay for the money to support them.
They think so because it is impossible for the government to support the old people in the country and some people disagree the idea that the government has to support the old by using the tax. However, In the event that It would occur, The tax burdens will increase to support the old people.
Considering the views above, I believe that the government should support the old by using their money. the reason why I argue like this is we should consider social cost which means spending the money for the old people by using the government's money is the best way to reduce social conflicts.
In conclusion whether the family has to pay for the money or not, It would be a great decision to reduce the social conflicts only.
In this argument, I will discuss both views and explain my personal view of "who will be pay for the cost to support the old".
People who believe that the government should play for the money to support old people have valid reasons for saying so.
First, It will be possible for them to make their communities to communicate each other if the government spends the cost and recommends the opportunity to make a conversation among them.
Second, the supporters of this argue that It's one of the government's duties to support the old. because they think that the government isn't non-profit organization compared to the corporations.
on the other hand, there are those who think that the family with the old has to pay for the money to support them.
They think so because it is impossible for the government to support the old people in the country and some people disagree the idea that the government has to support the old by using the tax. However, In the event that It would occur, The tax burdens will increase to support the old people.
Considering the views above, I believe that the government should support the old by using their money. the reason why I argue like this is we should consider social cost which means spending the money for the old people by using the government's money is the best way to reduce social conflicts.
In conclusion whether the family has to pay for the money or not, It would be a great decision to reduce the social conflicts only.
Hi Kevin, please do not forget to state the question(s) in your compositions so that I will be able to provide you with the corrections and maybe change some vocabulary to make your response more substantial.
