Since the AIs are improving, they might be able to feel the emotions in the nearby future.
Revised Debate Argument:
I believe robots should replace human workers, and here’s why:
First, robots can do repetitive tasks more efficiently than humans. For example, while a human might make 100 toys a day, robots could produce more than 150 toys daily.
Second, robots don’t need breaks. They only require time to recharge, unlike people who need holidays.
Lastly, some believe robots can't handle jobs that require emotions, but that’s not true. With AI improving, robots may be able to understand emotions in the near future.
Corrections Made:
-
"robot" → "robots" for subject consistency.
-
"more better" → "more efficiently" (corrected the redundancy).
-
"when a human make" → "while a human might make" (subject-verb agreement and clarity).
-
"time to take a rest" → "breaks" (simplified expression).
-
"buts thats are not true" → "but that’s not true" (grammar correction).
-
"Since the AIs are improving, they might be able to feel the emotions" → "With AI improving, robots may be able to understand emotions" (clarity and conciseness).
