However, there have been no recorded cases owing to it. so, just opposing genetics make-up can’t be an alternative plan for those who suffer from rare diseases.
To sum up, historically, there have been arguments since people started developing technology on medicine. However, that kind of arguments couldn’t stop the progressing technology. So we should find both ways, progressing new technology medicine as changing genetic make-up and making the medicine which can prevent from side effects.
They also insist that as to have better babies if they change the genetic make-up, it may cause have a baby who has abnormal gene.
However, there have been no recorded cases owing to it. so,[the first word in a sentence is not capitalized it should be "So"] just opposing genetics[wrong adverb used, adverb used instead of adjective or vice-versa>genetics>it should be genetic] make-up can’t be an alternative plan for those who suffer from rare diseases.
To sum up, historically, there have been arguments since people started developing technology on>>it should be "in" medicine. However, that kind of arguments couldn’t stop the progressing technology. So we should find both ways, progressing new technology medicine as changing genetic make-up and making the medicine which can prevent from side effects.
Hi~
Kevin, through the corrections:)
