Museums need money to maintain good condition for public people. Facilities, employees salary and other expenses are required. According to one of art articles, Louvre museum's one-year expense is over hundreds million dollars. It's remarkable expensive to justify for free admission fee. For this reason, the museum won't handle this if people don't charge the fee. Moreover, visitors can't see clean circumstances and high quality services. Therefore, people should pay for keeping good condition for museums.
When it comes to explain other reason, I believe that people have a duty to protect our art legacy by charging for admission. Each art is meaningful. Because it shows contemporary situation and historical record. For instance, Picasso drew "Guernika" after the world war two. He was shocked about the miserable moment of the war. He wanted to show the dismal situation at that time as a drawing. Like Picasso's art, art has significant meaning for human being. That's why people have to preserve their heritage. I think that the best action is paying for entrance fee of museums. Whether the cost is affordable or expensive, we should aware the value of art.
In conclusion, I reckon that the advances exceed the disadvantages for charging admission of museums.
I agree with the statement that the advantages of charging people for admission to museums OUTWEIGHS the disadvantages.
Museums need money FOR ITS MAINTENANCE IN CONSIDERATION OF THE PUBLIC PEOPLE. Facilities, employees salary and other expenses SHOULD BE MANDATORY. According to one of art articles, Louvre museum's one-year expense COST over hundreds OF million dollars. It's REMARKABLY expensive to justify for A free admission. For this reason, the museum MIGHT NOT handle this if people don't charge the fee. Moreover, visitors can't see clean circumstances and high quality services. Therefore, people should BE REQUIRED TO pay for keeping THE MUSEUM IN GOOD CONDITION.
ANOTHER reason IS, I believe that people SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE IN PROTECTING our art legacy by charging for admission. Each art is CRUCIAL. Because it shows contemporary situation and historical record. For instance, Picasso drew "Guernika" after the world war two. He was shocked about the miserable moment of the war. He wanted to show the dismal situation at that time THROUGH HIS drawing. Like Picasso's art, art has ITS significant meaning for human being. That's why people have to preserve their heritage. THEREFORE I CAN SAY that the best action is paying for AN entrance fee of museums. Whether the cost is affordable or expensive, we should GIVE IMPORTANCE TO the value of art.
In conclusion, I reckon that the ADVANTAGES exceeds the disadvantages for charging the admission of museums.
